And they call themselves Pro-Life.

I've spoken before of the ironies of the Pro-Life movement. People grouped to protect a single embryonic cell even if it's on the fast track to the dumpster even if it would save lives; Yet, will willingly send men off to die in an illogical war day after day and staunchly defend their continued presence there.
People so contradictory that will defend an unborn fetus to points of fanaticism, yet they will publish the names of doctors who perform abortions and label them murderers encouraging others to end his life, as ending the life of a murderer isn't a sin.

From that same camp of ideological, hypocritical fanatics:


According to the results of large cross-sectional survey of US medical practitioners, Atheist doctors are more likely to care for the poor than are Religious ones.

Words such as Humorous, Disgusting, Hypocritical come to mind when I hear that. They will preach day and night about Jebus, kill other living human beings because they are "Baby Killing Abortionists", and will refuse to care for other human beings because they can't get paid?

Really? I mean, Really. This is the moral ground you all purport to stand on?

Wow. Okay, I realize that I am a morally inept (because I'm an atheist, and apparently 'God' is the source of all morality), pagan-sinner-whore, and that I should pray to Jebus to forgive me.
But if doing that means that I'll spend 'Eternal Life' with these assholes or else have eternal Damnation in a fiery lake blah blah blah suffer blah forever and ever amen blah, I think I'll choose the latter, thanks for the invite though.

When I was growing up in a Christian house-hold, I knew of the hypocrisy in the Christian community. It was blatantly obvious, even to those most ingrained in it. There were always excuses for it, reasons why they acted and believed the way they knew was wrong and against Jesus' teachings.

It doesn't so much surprise me to learn of this outcome, more just disappointed.
I mean, Christian deem it necessary to cut out the 'bad' parts of the Old Testament, and say it's okay. Because JEBUS came and made all that pretty much useless.
But this sort of behavior directly contradicts everything Jesus teaches in the bible. Literally.

1Now when he saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His disciples came to him, 2and he began to teach them saying:
3"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

I won't say that Jesus in the New Testament wasn't a peaceful character who accepted all kinds of people from all walks of life, and that his supposed teachings aren't entirely helpful for those who need to be told what is right and what is wrong. In fact, it is my opinion that the character of Jesus as presented in the bible as a peace-nik loving, liberal Jew. However, the present day acts of his followers, and his actual teachings are quite the conflicting phenomenon.

And then they act confused when Non-Christians aren't exactly interested in being associated with such behavior.